Enterprise Guide: Comparing the Top AI Meeting Assistants in 2025

AI-powered meeting assistants have quickly evolved from nice-to-haves into essential productivity tools—especially for enterprise teams juggling dozens of meetings per week. Whether you’re looking for transcription, speaker analytics, summaries, or meeting intelligence, today’s AI tools offer a broad and overlapping set of capabilities.

Below is a comprehensive analysis of 9 leading meeting assistants, including pros, cons, and recommendations based on enterprise use cases.

1. Fireflies.ai

Pros:

• Accurate automated transcriptions across major platforms
• CRM and productivity tool integrations (e.g. Salesforce, Slack)
• Easy search across past meeting data

Cons:

• Accuracy may drop with poor audio or heavy accents
• Limited transcription minutes on free plan

2. Granola.ai

Pros:

• Meeting summaries and action item extraction
• Built specifically for investor and analyst workflows
• Lightweight and fast note generation

Cons:

• Still a young product with limited public benchmarking
• Fewer enterprise integrations (compared to more mature tools)

3. Avoma

Pros:

• Full meeting lifecycle support: agenda, notes, transcription, summaries
• CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot
• Speaker identification and topic segmentation

Cons:

• Learning curve due to wide feature set
• Advanced features only available on premium plans

4. TL;DV

Pros:

• Highlighting key moments during live meetings
• Transcripts in multiple languages
• Works with Zoom and Google Meet

Cons:

• Lighter on analytics vs competitors
• Interface may feel unintuitive for first-time users

5. Krisp.ai

Pros:

• Best-in-class AI noise cancellation
• Speaker and background voice separation
• Local audio processing for security

Cons:

• Not a full meeting assistant (no transcription or summaries)
• Focuses on call quality, not content capture

6. Equaltime

Pros:

• Real-time inclusivity and talk time metrics
• Encourages balanced conversation in group meetings
• Works with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams

Cons:

• Niche feature set
• Not suitable for transcription-heavy or action item tracking needs

7. Otter.ai

Pros:

• Accurate, real-time transcription with speaker labeling
• Summary and keyword highlights post-meeting
• Mobile and web accessibility

Cons:

• Free tier has transcription minute limits
• Auto-joining bots may raise security concerns in regulated industries

8. Fellow.app

Pros:

• Meeting agenda, notes, and action items in one UI
• Great for recurring 1:1s and team meetings
• Integrations with Asana, Slack, Zoom

Cons:

• Doesn’t offer AI transcription or recording
• Focused more on productivity than AI automation

9. Fathom.video

Pros:

• Instant summaries and action items post-call
• CRM integration for pushing meeting notes
• Shareable highlight clips

Cons:

• Primarily Zoom-focused (limited other platform support)
• Not as customizable as some competitors

🏢 Enterprise Recommendations

• For end-to-end meeting intelligence: Go with Avoma or Fireflies.ai – they support large teams, integrate well, and offer rich analytics.
• For high-volume transcription and sharing: Otter.ai or Fathom.video are strong choices.
• If privacy or noise control is key: Krisp.ai enhances call quality without storing audio.
• For team collaboration-focused orgs: Fellow.app and Equaltime are ideal supplements.

Each tool brings something unique. Enterprises should choose based on use case depth (e.g., sales, recruiting, compliance), platform compatibility, and team size.

Explore more trusted tools at TrustedBy.ai.